lesbie-vague:

satan-your-lord-and-savior:

lesbie-vague:

aroacemonster:

jewish-dragonair:

cabincorecomrade:

thyrell:

how do you straight up admit this without thinking “maybe im the bad guy”

Anyways this is what is trans people are talking about when we say cis people’s allyship is performative. it’s so exhausting to see y’all reblog radfem lite posts with no critical thinking. I see it all the time

g-d terfs are so fucking gross

And this is why we need to call out people who aren’t radfems when they use radfem rhetoric. Because this shit is how they spread their vile views. By dressing it as something non-radfem people might agree with if they don’t know what to look out for who then keep spreading it and desensitizing people to those vile ideas.

Also in regards to the op: the reason people agree with radfem lite rhetoric is because they have different understandings of the words being used. If someone reblogs a post that says men are oppressive from a radfem, they probably have different ideas about the definition of man. So while they’re sort of agreeing with you, it’s probably better to think of it as agreeing with the same concept applied to a different group. Which does change the meaning of it. That’s why you don’t steal feminist posts from radfems kids! They don’t mean what you think they do

does anyone have an example of radfem lite post id like to recognocise them

terfs see trans women as men and would be including them in this:
https://lowoncliches.tumblr.com/post/174108635883/in-my-personal-experience-women-raise-their

terfs only see attraction that excludes trans people as gay:
http://amthsts-remade.tumblr.com/post/149396206168/this-post-was-stolen-from-a-terf-full-offense

If you need any more explanation on why these are still bad, lmk.

Leave a comment