Even this is unacceptable.
“The second-degree verdict reflects the jury’s finding that Van Dyke believed his life was in danger but that the belief was unreasonable. The jury also had the option of first degree-murder, a charge that required a finding that the shooting was unnecessary and unreasonable.“
So the jury believed that Van Dyke believed a teenager walking away from him = a danger to his life? Really?Also:
“Second-degree murder usually carries a sentence of less than 20 years, especially for someone with no criminal history. Probation is also an option.“
Who wants to bet that he gets probation for shooting into the back of a teenager 16 times?
Police officer found guilty in Chicago teen’s shooting | CBC News
ForLoveFromFear 